Kinnegad and the Royal Canal

Ruth Delany, in her Ireland’s Royal Canal 1789–2009 (with Ian Bath) The Lilliput Press, Dublin 2010, tells us that the promoters of the Royal Canal decided to divert it through Kinnegad. In January 1801 the Directors General of Inland Navigation asked the engineer John Brownrigg to inspect the route:

Brownrigg was very critical of the diversion proposed in order to pass through Kinnegad, which he said would bring the line through bog and broken quarry. The route through Thomastown was not only better, he felt, but brought in a good water supply ….

John Rennie too, in 1802, criticised the Kinnegad route, even though work had begun on its construction — despite the fact that the company would have needed approval, which it did not get, for that diversion from the route originally approved. The Kinnegad route was abandoned, but the company owned the land for many years afterwards, which may explain why it was shown on the 6″ Ordnance Survey map of ~1840. Here is the western end of the work.

The western end

The western end

Here is the central section; my map extract overlaps slightly with the extracts showing the two ends.

Non-Royal 02

The middle section

Here is the eastern end, showing where the Thomastown route went.

Non-Royal 03

The eastern end and the line of the Royal Canal

Here is an overview of the route. I tried underlining it in red but my line is a bit wobbly.

Non-Royal 04

An overview of the whole line (with wobbly red line beneath the proposed canal)

You can follow the route for yourself; this link should take you to the place where the abandoned line diverges from the current line of the Royal. Make sure you have selected Historic 6″ to get the map from ~1840.

Ruth Delany said that she and the crew of Hark were able to identify the start of the route in 1955. Is it still identifiable?

My OSI logo and permit number for website

[RC60]

5 responses to “Kinnegad and the Royal Canal

  1. when i passed in the summer i couldnt spot it although i may just have missed it.it is quit hilly in that area if i remember correctly.

  2. Thanks, Paul. I haven’t been along that way for years myself, and I didn’t know to look out for it at the time. bjg

  3. yes,it is mentioned in the royal canal guide book.because i am allways looking out for wide spots/potential turning points i do know that there is a wide spot east of the hill of down.i think its a job best researched walking than boating.

  4. Brian,

    I am distraught……was doing a bit for Donal B recently and thought I’d discovered a redundant branch. !!

    Mick

  5. Any pics? bjg

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s