Category Archives: Tourism

IBRA list

The website for Boat Holidays Ireland, which included a list of members of the Irish Boat Rental Association, seems to have disappeared. I don’t know whether it has been replaced or whether IBRA members have ceased cooperation. I can’t find any useful information on the website of the Irish Marine Federation.

Courtesy flag

Proper order

Proper order

Spray

May spray

May spray

Convoy

Convoy on Lough Derg

Convoy on Lough Derg

A call to patriotic action …

… said Brian Lenihan of his 2009 Budget, which did not greatly impress Michael Hennigan of FinFacts, who had a highly entertaining, if sadly prescient, article here.

 […] political self-interest, incompetence, negligence and laziness […] litany of failure, smugness, hubris and neglect […] the incompetence of the toxic cocktail of former school teachers, small town solicitors, social workers and bookkeepers […]

How true those words are, even today. (The “toxic cocktail” was the membership of the government.)

Anyway, on 24 April I heard Josephine Feehily of the Revenue Commissioners saying on the wireless that the minimum rate of compliance for self-assessed taxes was 80%. I fear that she may not have taken account of the Mineral Oil Tax, which has been largely ignored by the citizenry.

Just to recap, this idiotic tax is the result of governmental cowardice and unwillingness to tell even a small, insignificant interest group to get stuffed. For historical reasons, owners of diesel-powered boats, in some countries, were allowed to use rebated (“red” or “green” low-tax) diesel, AKA marked gas oil. The EU said, many years ago, that this subsidy should no longer be given to owners of private pleasure craft. The governments concerned accepted that, but asked for time to introduce the change. When that period ran out, without their having done anything about it, they asked for a further deferral, and then yet another. The EU finally got fed up and told them to get on with it.

The Irish government, with that low cunning and contempt for the law that has so endeared us to other EU states, decided to reject the obvious method of implementing the new rule, which would have been to charge owners of private pleasure craft the full (non-rebated) price at the pump. Instead, it came up with a scheme that had no chance of working properly: it allowed owners of private pleasure craft to continue to buy diesel at the low price provided that they made returns, once a year, showing the amount of diesel they had bought and paying the difference between the rebated price and the full price. This difference is called the Mineral Oil Tax [PDF].

Such a scheme might have had a chance of working in Switzerland or Germany, places where citizens often obey the law even when nobody is looking, but it had no chance at all in Ireland. And so indeed it proved to be.

In 2010, 38 boat-owners paid the tax for 2009.

In 2011, 41 boat-owners paid the tax for 2010.

In 2012, 22 boat-owners paid the tax for 2011. The total amount received was €53,398.58 on 141,503.29 litres of diesel. That’s an average of 6432.1 litres per return, which is very high; I think that a lot of that is accounted for by the hire fleets.

I now have the latest figures.

In 2013, 23 boat-owners paid the tax for 2012. The total amount received was €113,841.45 on 301,674 litres of diesel.

It is gratifying to note that the number of returns has increased, even if it is still a tiny proportion of the total number of owners of diesel-powered private pleasure craft. But the increase in the amount received and in the number of litres returned is staggering: both figures have more than doubled. I am unable to explain the increase.

As I said last year, this ridiculous tax should be scrapped; those operating private pleasure craft should be required to use non-rebated diesel. Taxes that cannot be collected bring the whole system into disrepute and strengthen citizen contempt for the state and for society. In taxation, you’ve got to grab them by the balls; then their hearts and minds will follow. That’s why VAT and PAYE are so effective.

 

The Clones Sheugh and other northern waters

Industrial Heritage Ireland has been visiting Ulster waterways including the Blackwater, which linked the Ulster Canal to Lough Neagh.

Brian Cassells was quoted again in the Belfast Telegraph on 27 April 2013. He believes that walking in the country is a Good Thing, although it’s not clear why that requires a canal. I trust that Sammy Wilson will stand firm and refuse to spend public money on a project that has an even stronger political smell than the proposed Narrow Water Bridge.

Horatio was told …

… that there were more things in heaven and earth than were dreamt of in his philosophy.

They did not, however, include any more holders of marked fuel traders’ licences [xls] along the Shannon.

Piers and seed potatoes

I dare say you’ve observed, Major, how singularly little originality there is about Chief Secretaries. One of them, whose name is lost in the mists of antiquity, thought of piers and seed potatoes, and since then all his successors have gone on building piers and handing out seed potatoes. They never hit on anything original. Now if I was a Chief Secretary I’d strike out a line of my own. When I found I had to build something I’d run up a few round towers.

Thus the Rev J J Meldon, curate of Ballymoy, to Major Kent in George A Birmingham’s excellent Spanish Gold. (Birmingham was really Canon James Owen Hannay, who managed to annoy nationalist Catholics, which is always useful.)

Amongst the builders of piers were Alexander Nimmo and the Shannon Commissioners, whose works on the estuary included Saleen Pier.

The Irish Press Releases website has a page dated 17 April 2013:

Funding approved for Clare piers

Co. Clare, Ireland — 17 Apr. 2013 — Funding has been approved for various harbour and pier improvement projects in County Clare. Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Simon Coveney, T.D., today announced funds totalling 91,500 euro for projects at Ballyvaughan, Cappagh, Liscannor, Carrigaholt and Kilbaha harbours/piers.

“The safety works scheduled to take place at these harbours will have a hugely positive impact on the livelihoods of fishermen and other users of the piers,” explained Clare Senator Tony Mulcahy. He added: “These projects are central to ensuring the safety of all users of the piers. The continued upgrading of these piers is essential to the development of both industry and tourism in the respective areas.”

The funding announcement features allocations of €22,500 to Carrigaholt, €37,500 to Ballyvaughan, €9,000 to Kilbaha, and €11,250 to both Liscannor and Cappagh.

According to Senator Mulcahy: “The funding contribution from the Government covers 75% of the total cost of the relevant projects which include repairs to the pier wall in Ballyvaughan, the installation of a handrail to pier access, harbour wall and upgrade of visitor moorings at Carrigaholt, a complete remediation to the existing pier walls at Liscannor, repairs to the sea wall at Cappagh, and repairs to the harbour wall capping stones at Kilbaha.”

Carrigaholt, Kilbaha and Cappa[gh] are all Shannon Estuary harbour or piers; Cappa[gh] was extended by the Shannon Commissioners. This press release suggests therefore that, if the Chief Secretary’s successors cannot afford to build any new piers, they can at least afford some money to repair them. There is no news about seed potatoes (or, alas, about fodder).

Unfortunately I could find nothing about this topic either on the website of Senator Tony Mulcahy FG or on that of the Department of Agriculture and Technical Instruction, although I may have had the wrong search terms. However, some other (coincidentally. also Fine Gael) politicians have welcomed the planned spending of money on Glin pier [do look at all the pics], which seems to be used only for swimming, so perhaps there is a nationwide campaign of spending small amounts of money in many places — and getting local Fine Gael pols to announce it. Presumably it distracts attention from the shortage of seed potatoes.

The Minister for Ag is a member of Fine Gael.

 

What is the point of newspapers?

The Irish Independent says today:

Canal ‘to reopen’ after 80 years

Part of the cross-border Ulster Canal which has not been used for 80 years is to reopen, it has been revealed. […]

It says that the NI environment minister, Alex Attwood, announced that planning permission had been granted in Northern Ireland for the restoration of the Clones Sheugh and that Brian Cassells of the Inland Waterways Association of Ireland expected restoration to be extended all the way to Lough Neagh, which he thought would be a good thing.

Waterways Ireland has a press release here [PDF], the Impartial Reporter covers it here, the Indo’s sister-paper the Belfast Telegraph report is here and 4ni has a brief account here.

I realise that it would be folly to expect newspapers to know anything about the subjects they write about, but shouldn’t they do something to check the press releases they’re given? A moment’s googling would have shown that “is to reopen” is, to put it mildly, an overstatement, because there can be no reopening until funding is provided. The last Irish government undertook to pay the cost but soon found that it couldn’t afford it; it and its successor have, since then, been trying to disguise the fact (and to find a crock of gold).

Of course, even if the Irish government does find the funding, spending it on a dead-end stump of a canal to Clones would be a waste of money, and there is not the slightest possibility that the canal will ever get any further. Some Clones folk, and inland boat-owners, are all in favour of it, but they’re not offering to pay for it.

But back to the newspapers. Shouldn’t they check the context, as well as the content, of press releases to ensure that the published accounts tell the full story?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marina occupancy

Practical Boat Owner, a magazine, reports [in its June 2013 issue, published in April] that the British Marine Federation surveyed its members in February and March 2013 to ask about gross capacity and actual occupancy of their marinas in January 2013. The BMF press release is here.

It got 145 valid responses, a 56% response rate; it reckons that that means 31% of all UK marinas and 38% of all UK marina berths.

The total capacity of the marinas was 29118 and the occupancy 23462, which the BMF says is an 80.5% occupancy rate and a 19.5% vacancy rate.

Of those marinas, 69 [or perhaps 68] were tidal or coastal, with a total capacity of 17604 berths and the occupancy 14227 berths: an 80.8% occupancy rate and a 19.2% vacancy rate.

There were 53 responses from marinas on C&RT waterways; they had 7710 berths, 6122 of them occupied: 79.4% occupancy and 20.6% vacancy.

There were 23 responses from marinas on the waters of other navigation authorities, including the Environment Agency, the Broads Authority and some national authorities responsible for lakes. They had 3804 berths, 3113 occupied: 81.8% occupancy and 18.2% vacancy.

I don’t know what difference it would have made if the survey had been conducted at some other time of year. Should we assume that British boaters all book marina berths for the full year?

I don’t know whether the Irish Marine Federation or its associate group, the Irish Marina Operators Association, has published anything similar. While the IMOA has members on coastal and estuarial waters, it doesn’t seem to have any on non-tidal waterways. It would be interesting to know the vacancy rate on inland marinas, although there are definitional problems (does a block of flats with some moorings constitute a marina?). Maybe the only way to find out is to get HarbourAir to take aerial photos on one of their flights.