Category Archives: Extant waterways

Early water transport

In a piece about the Augustinian Priory at Athassel, near Golden in Co Tipperary, I wrote

But the really extraordinary thing about Athassel, at least from the waterways viewpoint, is that Dundry stone was used for sculptural (but not for structural) work.

Now, that may mean as little to you as it did to me, until I looked it up and found that Dundry is in Somerset, on the Bristol Channel. The stone could have been taken from there to Waterford by sea and it must have been hauled up the Suir from there.

In the last century, the horse-drawn traffic up the Suir to Clonmel ceased, and Carrick-on-Suir became the effective head of the navigation. But Athassel is at least another twenty miles upstream from Clonmel, and cargoes were brought up there seven hundred or so years ago.

However, traffic in materials for religious establishments was not all one way, and I am indebted to John Ditchfield for the information that some of the oak used in the roof of Salisbury Cathedral was felled in Ireland, on or near the east coast, in the spring of 1222 and used by 1225. Timber from 75 trees has been identified and at least one shipment, by William of Dublin, is recorded in 1224.

Inside Salisbury Cathedral (courtesy of John Ditchfield 2015)

Inside Salisbury Cathedral (courtesy of John Ditchfield 2015)

A 2003 story in the Telegraph says

The wood was bought from “William of Dublin” and carted from Bristol or Southampton.

However, in the English Heritage [now Historic England] report from 2002 on The Tree-Ring Dating of the Roof Carpentry of the Eastern Chapels, North Nave Triforium, and North Porch, Salisbury Cathedral, Wiltshire [PDF], I found nothing about how the timber got from the English coast to Salisbury, which is some distance inland.

It may be, of course, that the Patent Rolls for AD 1224 say what English port was used and how the timber was transported from there to Salisbury. I do not, alas, have a copy of the Patent Rolls to hand and Messrs Google don’t seem to have been able to get hold of them for digitising.

But if the Patent Rolls don’t provide evidence to the contrary, my guess would be that the timber was carried up the Avon. And that might enable Rollalot to insert another date between the first and second in the history of Avon navigation on this page; Rollalot, like me, has read Douglas Caffyn on the right to navigate on rivers.

 

The Boyne’s turf-sided lock

I have a vague recollection of being told that there was no evidence that the turf-sided Lock 2, Oldbridge Guard Lock, on the Boyne Navigation was ever fitted with gates. Or perhaps it was that only a single pair was fitted and that the lock did not operate as a lock.

Boyne Locks 1 & 2 (OSI ~1840)

Boyne Locks 1 & 2 (OSI ~1840)

I’m not clear about what I was told but I recall feeling somewhat surprised, given that the lock has stone buttresses at both ends that could have been fitted with gates.

Gate buttresses of turf lock 01_resize_resize

Looking up into the lock past the lower stone buttresses

I should point out that my photos were taken in 2008; much more work has been done since then.

Gate buttresses of turf lock 02_resize_resize

Both sets of buttresses and the bridge

Gate buttresses of turf lock 03_resize_resize

The upper buttresses

Yet it is true that the 6″ Ordnance Survey map, from around 1840, does not show gates on the lock.

Oldbridge Guard Lock (Lock 2) (OSI ~1840)

Oldbridge Guard Lock (Lock 2) (OSI ~1840)

Unfortunately the relevant section of the 25″ OSI map, from around 1900, is blank at time of writing so I can’t check what it shows.

The turf-sided lock on the Boyne

The turf-sided lock on the Boyne

The IWAI Boyne Navigation Branch is currently (March 2015) working towards the installation of gates at the lock but I don’t know whether they’re installing one pair or two pairs.

From reading the reports of the Superintendent for the Boyne Navigation, it is clear that, for at least some part of the period while the navigation was controlled by the Board of [Public] Works, the lock had both top and bottom (breast and tail) gates. Here are some relevant extracts from the reports; I’ve given only enough to make the point.

In January 1869 James Bellew, Superintendent, reported on the works carried out on the Boyne Navigation in 1868. His report, published in the Thirty-seventh Report from the Board of Public Works, Ireland: with the Appendices, for the year 1868 [Alexander Thom for HMSO, Dublin 1869], included this:

Oldbridge Station.

The lock-gates at this station are in excellend working order. The chimney of the lock-keeper’s house has been rebuilt, and some alterations made in the house to render it more comfortable. The guard lock-gates are old, but as they are used only in time of flood, I am of opinion they will last some time longer.

In March 1871, his successor, P J Dodd, wrote in the Thirty-ninth Report:

Oldbridge Guard-lock gates.

The Oldbridge Guard-lock gates are in a very bad state of repair, but new breast gates have been ordered, the contractors have same in hands, and they will be erected during the coming fine season.

And in March 1873 Dodd wrote in the Forty-first Report:

Oldbridge Guard-lock Gates.

The new breast gates of guard-lock [sic] have acted well during the year and heavy flood season, and are in a first class state at present; the tail gates, although old and shaken, are in fair working order, and did very well during the year.

In March 1877 he wrote in the Forty-fifth Report:

Oldbridge Guard Lock-gates.

The breast gates are in very good order; but the tail gates are somewhat shaken, being old.

The gates were tarred in 1878 (Forty-seventh Report); the tail gates had “a slight repair” in 1878 (Forty-eighth Report) and, in April 1881 (Forty-ninth Report), Dodd reported that

These [guard lock] gates require some repairs to sluices and also to the sheeting.

In March 1882 (Fiftieth Report) Dodd wrote:

Oldbridge Guard Locks.

The breast gates are in good repair, tail gates require two new cross rails, sheeting for both folds, and one new balance beam and handrails for both gates.

I do not, of course, know whether there were two pairs of gates at other times.

My OSI logo and permit number for website

News from the Windsor and Eton Express

A memorial to the lord lieutenant from the gentry and landed proprietors of Sligo, Leitrim, Fermanagh, and Cavan, lies in Enniskillen for signatures. It prays that a canal may be formed which will connect Lough Earne [sic] with Lough Allen, and that again with Lough Gill, which is navigable to Sligo. This, with the canal already sanctioned between Lough Erne and Neagh, will open a communication across the kingdom, from Sligo to the ports of Newry and Belfast. In a commercial point of view, this undertaking is of the greatest importance to Ireland.

Windsor and Eton Express Saturday 28 May 1825

And quite right too

From the Dublin Weekly Register Saturday 15 June 1822:

A boy of the name of Thomas Brady was brought into custody to the Head Police Office, on Sunday morning, by James Devereux, Ranger of the Grand Canal, having been found bathing in the canal, at Charlemont-bridge, about the hour of five o’clock on the same morning. He has since been committed to Newgate.

Waterside Belturbet

Here is a small amount of information about Belturbet and some of its industrial heritage. The photos were taken on a brief visit in July 2011.

Was the Brickey a navigation?

The Brickey is a small river that flows into Dungarvan Bay. Small boats used its lower, tidal reaches, but in the eighteenth century there was a proposal to link the Brickey to the Finisk, another small river that flows into the Blackwater south of Cappoquin.

Waterford County Museum, and others, believe that work began on that project in the mid nineteenth century and that a driveable track along the south bank of a stretch of the river was built as a towpath.

I have visited the river and looked online for further information; my conclusions (with maps and photographs) are here. However, I would welcome further information.

Grand Canal Greenway

Ewan Duffy reports on damage here.

A grand day out in Galway for small boats

Here, courtesy of Kyran O’Gorman, are his notes on navigating the Ballycuirke Canal from Lough Corrib to Ross Lake. Small boats only, and at your own risk.

The importance of Saunderson’s Sheugh

Back in the days when nitwitted Irish governments believed the state had found the secret to permanent wealth, Sinn Féin was promised the Clones Sheugh, a rebuilding of part of the line of the Ulster Canal. For reasons that are not clear to me, the reason for the project was concealed by a lot of nonsense about economic regeneration.

Sinn Féin still want their sheugh, and have continually asked questions about it. They own the Northern Ireland department currently responsible for waterways. And they have, I believe, forced its southern counterpart to pretend it will deliver the sheugh. Admittedly it’s really just going to dredge the River Finn — Saunderson’s Sheugh — and call it the Ulster Canal, which is better and cheaper than doing anything about the real Ulster Canal, but we might wonder why the current southern minister, Heather Humphreys, a TD for the Cavan-Monaghan constituency wherein Clones lies, is quite so keen on sheughery.

Perhaps Wikipedia can help.

Cavan-Monaghan constituency, general election 2011

Cavan-Monaghan constituency, general election 2011

Unmodified text released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC BY-SA); no endorsement by the licensor is expressed or implied.

A canal is not just for Christmas …

… but I’d like to know more about Mr Christmas’s canals.

Off the Suir, near Mount Congreve.