Tag Archives: vessels

A call to patriotic action …

… said Brian Lenihan of his 2009 Budget, which did not greatly impress Michael Hennigan of FinFacts, who had a highly entertaining, if sadly prescient, article here.

 […] political self-interest, incompetence, negligence and laziness […] litany of failure, smugness, hubris and neglect […] the incompetence of the toxic cocktail of former school teachers, small town solicitors, social workers and bookkeepers […]

How true those words are, even today. (The “toxic cocktail” was the membership of the government.)

Anyway, on 24 April I heard Josephine Feehily of the Revenue Commissioners saying on the wireless that the minimum rate of compliance for self-assessed taxes was 80%. I fear that she may not have taken account of the Mineral Oil Tax, which has been largely ignored by the citizenry.

Just to recap, this idiotic tax is the result of governmental cowardice and unwillingness to tell even a small, insignificant interest group to get stuffed. For historical reasons, owners of diesel-powered boats, in some countries, were allowed to use rebated (“red” or “green” low-tax) diesel, AKA marked gas oil. The EU said, many years ago, that this subsidy should no longer be given to owners of private pleasure craft. The governments concerned accepted that, but asked for time to introduce the change. When that period ran out, without their having done anything about it, they asked for a further deferral, and then yet another. The EU finally got fed up and told them to get on with it.

The Irish government, with that low cunning and contempt for the law that has so endeared us to other EU states, decided to reject the obvious method of implementing the new rule, which would have been to charge owners of private pleasure craft the full (non-rebated) price at the pump. Instead, it came up with a scheme that had no chance of working properly: it allowed owners of private pleasure craft to continue to buy diesel at the low price provided that they made returns, once a year, showing the amount of diesel they had bought and paying the difference between the rebated price and the full price. This difference is called the Mineral Oil Tax [PDF].

Such a scheme might have had a chance of working in Switzerland or Germany, places where citizens often obey the law even when nobody is looking, but it had no chance at all in Ireland. And so indeed it proved to be.

In 2010, 38 boat-owners paid the tax for 2009.

In 2011, 41 boat-owners paid the tax for 2010.

In 2012, 22 boat-owners paid the tax for 2011. The total amount received was €53,398.58 on 141,503.29 litres of diesel. That’s an average of 6432.1 litres per return, which is very high; I think that a lot of that is accounted for by the hire fleets.

I now have the latest figures.

In 2013, 23 boat-owners paid the tax for 2012. The total amount received was €113,841.45 on 301,674 litres of diesel.

It is gratifying to note that the number of returns has increased, even if it is still a tiny proportion of the total number of owners of diesel-powered private pleasure craft. But the increase in the amount received and in the number of litres returned is staggering: both figures have more than doubled. I am unable to explain the increase.

As I said last year, this ridiculous tax should be scrapped; those operating private pleasure craft should be required to use non-rebated diesel. Taxes that cannot be collected bring the whole system into disrepute and strengthen citizen contempt for the state and for society. In taxation, you’ve got to grab them by the balls; then their hearts and minds will follow. That’s why VAT and PAYE are so effective.

 

Horatio was told …

… that there were more things in heaven and earth than were dreamt of in his philosophy.

They did not, however, include any more holders of marked fuel traders’ licences [xls] along the Shannon.

Royal Canal, Dublin

Some superb pics here, by Conor Nolan, of converted working boats on the final descent into Dublin on the recently reopened Royal Canal.

 

Socialists, boat-owners and taxpayers

According to the wonderful KildareStreet.com, on 25 April 2013 Jimmy Deenihan, Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht [FG Kerry North/West Limerick] and prominent supporter of the Lartigue monorail, answered two written questions by Clare Daly [Socialist, Dublin North]:

31. To ask the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht if he will ensure that Waterways Ireland will respect the rights of citizens who have lived on residential barges in Lowtown, County Kildare, for more than a decade. [19163/13]

38. To ask the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht the dealings he has had with Waterways Ireland in relation to the Lowtown Marina, County Kildare, with particular reference to safeguarding the homes of boat dwellers who have resided there for more than a decade. [19164/13]

Jimmy Deenihan gave no ground:

I propose to take Questions Nos. 31 and 38 together.

As the Deputy will appreciate, the issues referred to relate to operational day to day matters for Waterways Ireland, for which I have no direct responsibility. However, the Deputy can be assured that Waterways Ireland respects the rights of all users of the navigations under its remit. I am advised by Waterways Ireland that it has carried out significant improvements in the Lowtown area over the last number of years. A new amenity block, including toilets and showers, has been provided, as well as new moorings and other facilities. Some of the moorings at Lowtown have access to electricity, water and lighting and Waterways Ireland would encourage all boat permit holders in the area to avail of these facilities. Boat dwellers can be accommodated on the new moorings under an Extended Mooring Permit.

Waterways Ireland has also endeavoured to regularise the ownership and lease arrangements at Lowtown Marina and it continues to work closely with the owners of the adjacent boat yard in that regard. I am informed that unsafe moorings currently in place there have to be removed, for health and safety reasons.

I am advised that throughout this period when works were planned and underway, Waterways Ireland communicated updates on developments by letter to all permit holders, including barge dwellers, with regard to mooring locations and extended mooring permits. It also responded to queries from a number of individual barge dwellers by email, letter, phone and onsite meetings. In addition, press releases were issued to local media. This approach to communicating with stakeholders will continue.

It would be interesting to know what rights Clare Daly thinks might be infringed, what obligation the taxpayer is assumed to have towards boat dwellers, how much the boat dwellers are paying to the taxpayer and what proportion of the costs of the waterways those users are covering. My own view is that the taxpayer is not obliged to subsidise boat-owners, and that a rational taxpayer might choose to devote resources to some other end, but then I never have understood socialism, save as explained by P G Wodehouse’s Psmyth in Mike:

I am with you, Comrade Jackson. You won’t mind my calling you Comrade, will you? I’ve just become a Socialist. It’s a great scheme. You ought to be one. You work for the equal distribution of property, and start by collaring all you can and sitting on it.

 

 

No more Latin, no more French …

… no more licensed traders in marked fuels [xls] along the Shannon.

Funny how few marinas sell diesel nowadays.

It is notoriously known …

… through the universal world that there be nine worthy and the best that ever were, as William Caxton so well put it. To the eight holders of licences to sell marked diesel along the Shannon must now be added Emerald Star in Belturbet on the Erne.

The Charles Wye Williams bridge campaign

Dublin City Council has published its call for proposals for naming the new bridge across the Liffey. According to RTE, various bolshies and literary types have been suggested, as though we didn’t have enough of them (and of politicians too). Accordingly, I have submitted an application suggesting that the bridge be named after a successful entrepreneur who understood technology and created employment: Charles Wye Williams, the Father of the Shannon, whose fleet of nine steamers and fifty-two barges gave us the Shannon as we know it today.

I will be happy to send a copy (PDF) of my application to anyone who is willing to support it.

Lock sizes on the Shannon Navigation

Some figures.

The Limerick Navigation: lock sizes

Here is a table showing the sizes of the locks on the (now abandoned) Limerick Navigation.

Sailing in the Lowtown high

WI & L&MK at Lowtown, with pics and map, here.