More for less

Press reports from last week’s plenary meeting [10 June 2011] of the North-South Ministerial Council suggest that Waterways Ireland and other cross-border bodies will be facing cuts. The Irish Independent, for example, quotes Peter Robinson, Northern Ireland’s First Minister, saying this:

There are no sacred cows. We want more for less and that is as much in respect of cross-border bodies as in any part of our administration.

Because the proportion of its current income contributed by each of the two governments is fixed, one side cannot unilaterally cut the amount it gives Waterways Ireland. These reports suggest that both sides want to cut WI’s income, although they might be satisfied with higher productivity in some form.

The press reports do not say whether the Clones [né Ulster] Canal was discussed. The NSMC website does not yet have a report of the meeting.

 

Astonishing news

The Western Rail Corridor has attracted rather fewer passengers than the, er, “business case” proposed. Well I never. I wonder whether there is any news about the religious affiliations of the Bishop of Rome.

A recent enquiry had me revisiting my page about the Tralee Ship Canal, another major waste of public money.

But governments (or at least their civil servants) never give in: it seems that the present crowd is determined to build an unnecessarily lavish road in the United Kingdom. Perhaps it would be cheaper to move the Limerick–Galway railway line up there. [The Alternative A5 Alliance could add that idea to the Wikipedia entry on the A5, which doesn’t seem to reflect their views.]

While responsibility for waterways has moved from Craggy Island to the Department of Tourism, Culture and Sport, it is entirely possible that existing policies will be implemented. It’s impossible to have any confidence that reason will prevail and that the planned Clones Canal will be dumped, although I continue to hope that there is an influential economist somewhere in the department.

Meanwhile, the Clones Dudes are trying hard to get people to invest in waterways businesses: they organised visits to some of the surviving businesses along the Erne and the Shannon–Erne Waterway and they’re having a workshop on 23 June 2011 to tell people how to set up boat-repair, marina and water activity businesses.

Still, at least they’ve stopped referring to it as the Ulster Canal: they’ve now adopted the term Clones Canal, which suggests that they’ve accepted that the thing will never get beyond Clones. Perhaps there is a limit to the willingness even of Irish governments to waste public money (or ECB money) on pointless projects.

 

 

Departmental responsibility for waterways

Statutory Instrument No 195 of 2011 transfers responsibility for inland waterways (and Waterways Ireland and waterways northsouthery) from Craggy Island to the Department of Tourism, Culture and Sport.

It does not say whether the same people are still doing the work.

Text of the statutory instrument here.

 

Into the west

An unidentified sister-ship of the MGWR Royal Canal steamer Rambler went fishing in the west of Ireland ….

Transports of delight

While this site is about waterways transport, a railway or two has sneaked in, and so it may be permissible to mention road transport too. The transport museum at Howth is looking after as aspect of our heritage that the National Museum has ignored: the preservation of old road vehicles. Its collection includes commercial, passenger, military, utility and fire & emergency vehicles, and the museum needs (and deserves) support.

The National Museum

Why at least three quarters of its items should be dumped.

What happened to the Wingate?

On 22 September 1870 the Irish Times said that the owner of the new steam launch Wingate was

 willing, in case of six or eight gentlemen joining, to defray the expenses of making a cruise through the Grand Canal, down the Shannon to Limerick, and then up the river to its source.

The notice said that the launch would steam through Loughs Allen, Kay [now Key], Dee and Derg. I don’t know where Lough Dee is: perhaps it’s a typo (or printo) for Ree. There would be a side-trip to Lough Gill, taking the Lady of the Lake steamer to Sligo, and the launch would then take the Leitrim Canal (now the Shannon–Erne Waterway) to the Erne, covering the whole of it from Belturbet to Belleek.

After that, the Wingate would travel by the Ulster Canal to Lough Neagh and Coleraine, returning “either by Newry or the Royal Canal” to Dublin. It is not clear how the Royal Canal (which links Dublin to the Shannon) could form part of a route from Lough Neagh to Dublin.

Whoever wrote the notice suggested that the cruise would take ten days, which suggests a degree of optimism not consonant with a knowledge of the distances involved.

An ad appeared in the next day’s paper, offering for sale the Wingate, a composite steam screw launch lying at Kingstown (Dun Laoghaire), and saying that a cruise of 10–12 days, only as far as Lough Erne, could be arranged pending sale.

According to the invaluable Clydebuilt database, a launch called Wingate was built by T Wingate & Company of Glasgow in an unspecified year. But why was a new launch being offered for sale?

Richard Heaton’s genealogy website includes a collection of newspapers, and one of them, the Supplement to the Warder for 3 [not 31] September 1870, has an account of how the Wingate reached Dublin (Kingstown) from Scotland, where the owner had failed to find half a dozen hardy souls willing to accompany him on a tour of the Western Isles and the Highlands. This is scarcely surprising as the Wingate was an open launch only 35 feet long.

So who owned the Wingate? Did the owner manage to reach the Irish inland waterways, or was he forced to sell his launch? I would welcome more information.

Garryowen and Dover Castle

In 1840 the rival steamers Dover Castle and Garryowen competed for traffic on the Shannon Estuary. While I know of no pictures of the steamers (if you know of any, please let me know), we have a reasonable amount of information about their operations. I discuss some aspects of those operations here. For an explanation of the page title, see here, but do not be diverted down this byway.

Deaths at Portlaw

On 7 April 2010 two canoeists were drowned at a weir in Portlaw, on the River Clodiagh. The Marine Casualty Investigation Board report on the matter has just been published. It says inter alia:

  • This weir cannot be run.
  • The design of this weir made it impassable regardless of the waterflow over it.
  • The weir at Portlaw is, by design, next to impossible to escape
    from without the use of lifebuoys and or an access ladder.

The report does not say who designed and built this weir or when it
was done. I have asked Waterford County Council for information.

According to the Irish Independent, the families of the canoeists are considering legal action.

Some news stories about weirs at Portlaw here, here and here.

Sailing in Athlone

Athlone, from The Tourist's Illustrated Hand-Book for Ireland 3rd ed David Bryce, London 1854