Category Archives: Canals

Re-invention or re-creation?

I realise that many folk visit this website in order to find out what is hip and trendy, cool and with-it, in all sorts of fields, from beer to boating, casual dining to cost-benefit analysis. So, in order to keep readers down wid da kidz in da hood [as the young folk say], I’ve been checking out the latest, baddest [which means ‘goodest’, I gather, or what in the old days we would have called ‘best’], grooviest developments on tinterweb. It’s a thing called FaceTweet, and those cool dudes at Waterways Ireland have one of them. Hep to the jive, daddy-o [which means ‘How perfectly splendid, old boy’.]

As far as I can see, FaceTweet is in general intended for folk whose attention span renders them unable to read more than a single paragraph of continuous prose. But brevity is sometimes the soul of wit and good goods come in small parcels [sentiments for whose veracity I have not found peer-reviewed evidence]. And I was interested in Waterways Ireland’s self-description on the page:

Waterways Ireland is the Recreation Authority for over 1000km of Ireland’s Inland navigable waterways.

That phrase, Recreation Authority, does not occur in Waterways Ireland’s Business Plan 2015 [as approved by the North South Ministerial Council on 18 December 2014 and screwed up by the Council shortly afterwards] or in its Corporate Plan 2014–2016 [ditto]. Nor, according to its own search engine, is the phrase used on Waterways Ireland’s proper website [the search engine rather bafflingly reports “We don’t have any refiners to show you”].

Yet the concept of Waterways Ireland as a Recreation Authority is almost entirely in tune with the thinking underlying both of the plans and it is the neatest encapsulation I have yet seen of what WI is about.

I put in ‘almost’ there because the Corporate Plan‘s Executive Summary includes this:

Central to our vision for the future is the development of recreational, heritage and environmental opportunities that link people, history and nature, providing both local communities and visitors with compelling reasons to spend more time in the waterways environment.

While I’m all — well, somewhat — in favour of heritage and environment, the words seem to sit uneasily in that sentence: added as a form of ritual obeisance to the shade of Michael D Higgins, who ripped the rivers and canals from the sheltering embrace of the Office of Public Works engineers and proclaimed the waterways to be heritage artefacts. Heritage is no longer of great interest to TPTB and most people’s experience of it [whatever it is] is as entertainment or recreation; much the same applies to environment, which — for most people — is of interest only as providing a scenic background for more interesting activities.

So both heritage and environment can be subsumed under the heading of recreation, leaving Waterways Ireland with a neat, well-focused description of itself, a subheading for its title, and one that matches its Mission and Vision.

Mind you, it’s not entirely clear what a recreation authority is — Google finds relatively few [129000] instances of the term’s use, most of them in the Americas — but that might be no harm.

Waterways Ireland — the recreation authority

Hep to the jive, daddy-o: I like it.

 

Chains at the Black Bridge

It seems that the city edition of the Limerick Leader dated Saturday May 16 2015 carries a story saying that funding has been approved for the repair of the Black Bridge at Plassey. I can’t find the story on the Leader‘s website and I can’t find anything about it anywhere else [there is a limit to the amount of my life I am willing to spend trying to find anything on the Limerick Council website] except on the Leader‘s FaceTweet page, where I can expand the city edition front page.

There is a photo of several councillors, which of course is wonderful: no day is wasted if it offers an opportunity of looking at a photo of local councillors, especially important ones with chains.

From what I can read of the text, it seems that “councillors in City East” [which is not one of the Limerick districts listed here] are willing to spend €50,000 “to start work to make the walkway safe again”. And they hope that Clare County Council, the University of Limerick and Waterways Ireland will “also row in behind the project”.

Now, half a loaf is better than no bread, and €50,000 is better than a poke in the eye from a blind horse, but it’s not going to go very far towards the cost of repairing the Black Bridge. I don’t known whether it would even cover the cost of a full survey.

I’m sure that Waterways Ireland would be delighted to help, if the Department of Fairytales hadn’t raided its coffers to pay for Saunderson’s Sheugh. I have reason to believe that the university was willing to help — and that Clare County Council was not. I submitted a Freedom of Information request to the university, asking it for [recent] records relating to the Black Bridge. The university gave me three extracts from meetings of the Limerick Smarter Travel Steering Group:

9 January 2013
Funding not in place for Black Bridge

21 November 2013
Black Bridge: UL indicated that funding may be available from UL. LST [Limerick Smarter Travel] has indicated funding in the order of €100,000. UL may be able to mach [sic] this. Request for funding to be made formally to UL by LCCC and to include surveys and reports on bridge to date.

18 September 2014
RR said UL have set aside €100,000 towards Black bridge refurbishment but will need matched funding from LA [presumably local authority]. Black bridge will require a detailed study to identify what repair work will need to be carried out, also an AA study will be required, and proper consents from ABP [An Bord Pleanála?]. Funding currently not available from LA.
PON spoke to Clare Co Co. No funding available from them.
PC Department will not fund a pedestrian bridge.
RR can we look for alternative funding options, UL will ring fence for the moment.

An AA study is, I think, an Appropriate Assessment, a sort of employment creation scheme for bird-watchers who can read European directives [and sooner them than me].

The point to be remembered here is that Limerick County Council leased the bridge and undertook to keep it in repair; there is no obligation on Waterways Ireland, Clare County Council or the University of Limerick to spend a penny on it. The two parties on whom lies the responsibility for repairing the bridge are the Limerick Council and the Department of Finance, which latter has the power, under the lease, to do the work and charge it to the council. That would be a better use of its time and money than an unnecessary and intrusive footbridge in the middle of Limerick.

Hurrah for the red, white and orange

Colour discrimination seems to be rampant in Ireland. Of the sets of colours [red, white and blue] and [green, white and orange], there is Official Endorsement of two, green and blue, while red, white and orange are ignored. Even the North/South Ministerial Council has got in on the act, with a whole page on its website about greenways and blueways. They must have been overdosing on the Erne flag. Their page is a list of links, sort of plonked there without context or explanation, but there’s probably some hands-across-the-borderism or something going on.

I read in the Guardian today of a proposal for a greenway on the former railway line between Roscrea and Portumna via Birr. And a jolly good thing too, but how many greenways and blueways can one small island accommodate? How thinly will the tourists be spread? And what about those of us who hate walking, cycling, kayaking and other such energetic pursuits?

Backtracking the Barrow trackway

Some time ago I put up a page about the Barrow trackway [towing-path]. For some reason, the page disappeared shortly afterwards. I have now recreated it; unless or until it disappears again, it is here.

Momentous day on the Ulster Canal

The day work finally began on the Ulster Canal, after many years of planning and consideration. The opening ceremony was attended by many of the local gentry; the royal standard was hoisted, a 21-gun salute was fired, hundreds of people had turned up to see it and “the country people were liberally supplied with ale”. That evening, those most involved dined together in Caledon with toasts to the king, to the queen and the rest of the royal family and to the army and navy.

I suppose that similar festivities would attend the start of work on any canal nowadays, but that was back in 1835, and the canal was the real Ulster Canal.

The K&A in slow time

The Dundas aqueduct

The Dundas aqueduct

There is a television station or channel called BBC 4. On Tuesday next, 5 May 2015, it will broadcast

A two-hour, real-time canal boat journey down one of Britain’s most historic waterways, the Kennet and Avon Canal, from Top Lock in Bath to the Dundas Aqueduct. Using an uninterrupted single shot, the film is a rich and absorbing antidote to the frenetic pace and white noise of modern life.

More info here. I do not know whether folk outwith HM Realm can watch the programme on television or on tinterweb.

The Boyne’s turf-sided lock

I have a vague recollection of being told that there was no evidence that the turf-sided Lock 2, Oldbridge Guard Lock, on the Boyne Navigation was ever fitted with gates. Or perhaps it was that only a single pair was fitted and that the lock did not operate as a lock.

Boyne Locks 1 & 2 (OSI ~1840)

Boyne Locks 1 & 2 (OSI ~1840)

I’m not clear about what I was told but I recall feeling somewhat surprised, given that the lock has stone buttresses at both ends that could have been fitted with gates.

Gate buttresses of turf lock 01_resize_resize

Looking up into the lock past the lower stone buttresses

I should point out that my photos were taken in 2008; much more work has been done since then.

Gate buttresses of turf lock 02_resize_resize

Both sets of buttresses and the bridge

Gate buttresses of turf lock 03_resize_resize

The upper buttresses

Yet it is true that the 6″ Ordnance Survey map, from around 1840, does not show gates on the lock.

Oldbridge Guard Lock (Lock 2) (OSI ~1840)

Oldbridge Guard Lock (Lock 2) (OSI ~1840)

Unfortunately the relevant section of the 25″ OSI map, from around 1900, is blank at time of writing so I can’t check what it shows.

The turf-sided lock on the Boyne

The turf-sided lock on the Boyne

The IWAI Boyne Navigation Branch is currently (March 2015) working towards the installation of gates at the lock but I don’t know whether they’re installing one pair or two pairs.

From reading the reports of the Superintendent for the Boyne Navigation, it is clear that, for at least some part of the period while the navigation was controlled by the Board of [Public] Works, the lock had both top and bottom (breast and tail) gates. Here are some relevant extracts from the reports; I’ve given only enough to make the point.

In January 1869 James Bellew, Superintendent, reported on the works carried out on the Boyne Navigation in 1868. His report, published in the Thirty-seventh Report from the Board of Public Works, Ireland: with the Appendices, for the year 1868 [Alexander Thom for HMSO, Dublin 1869], included this:

Oldbridge Station.

The lock-gates at this station are in excellend working order. The chimney of the lock-keeper’s house has been rebuilt, and some alterations made in the house to render it more comfortable. The guard lock-gates are old, but as they are used only in time of flood, I am of opinion they will last some time longer.

In March 1871, his successor, P J Dodd, wrote in the Thirty-ninth Report:

Oldbridge Guard-lock gates.

The Oldbridge Guard-lock gates are in a very bad state of repair, but new breast gates have been ordered, the contractors have same in hands, and they will be erected during the coming fine season.

And in March 1873 Dodd wrote in the Forty-first Report:

Oldbridge Guard-lock Gates.

The new breast gates of guard-lock [sic] have acted well during the year and heavy flood season, and are in a first class state at present; the tail gates, although old and shaken, are in fair working order, and did very well during the year.

In March 1877 he wrote in the Forty-fifth Report:

Oldbridge Guard Lock-gates.

The breast gates are in very good order; but the tail gates are somewhat shaken, being old.

The gates were tarred in 1878 (Forty-seventh Report); the tail gates had “a slight repair” in 1878 (Forty-eighth Report) and, in April 1881 (Forty-ninth Report), Dodd reported that

These [guard lock] gates require some repairs to sluices and also to the sheeting.

In March 1882 (Fiftieth Report) Dodd wrote:

Oldbridge Guard Locks.

The breast gates are in good repair, tail gates require two new cross rails, sheeting for both folds, and one new balance beam and handrails for both gates.

I do not, of course, know whether there were two pairs of gates at other times.

My OSI logo and permit number for website

News from the Windsor and Eton Express

A memorial to the lord lieutenant from the gentry and landed proprietors of Sligo, Leitrim, Fermanagh, and Cavan, lies in Enniskillen for signatures. It prays that a canal may be formed which will connect Lough Earne [sic] with Lough Allen, and that again with Lough Gill, which is navigable to Sligo. This, with the canal already sanctioned between Lough Erne and Neagh, will open a communication across the kingdom, from Sligo to the ports of Newry and Belfast. In a commercial point of view, this undertaking is of the greatest importance to Ireland.

Windsor and Eton Express Saturday 28 May 1825

And quite right too

From the Dublin Weekly Register Saturday 15 June 1822:

A boy of the name of Thomas Brady was brought into custody to the Head Police Office, on Sunday morning, by James Devereux, Ranger of the Grand Canal, having been found bathing in the canal, at Charlemont-bridge, about the hour of five o’clock on the same morning. He has since been committed to Newgate.

Interesting information about the Ulster Canal …

… as distinct from ministerial reelection photo opportunities.

By the way, some folk get confused about the location of the Ulster Canal; this map may help:

Saunderson's Sheugh -v- the Ulster Canal (OSI ~1840)

Saunderson’s Sheugh -v- the Ulster Canal (OSI ~1840)

Anyway, for folk who are interested in weightier matters than ministers talking through portions of their anatomies that they can’t distinguish from their elbows, here is some speculation about opening bridges on the Ulster Canal.

That’s the Ulster Canal Ulster Canal, not the Saunderson’s Sheugh “Ulster Canal”, by the way.

My OSI logo and permit number for website